ESG Chapter 6-Engagement & Stewardship
2024-06-21 17:11:30 1 举报
AI智能生成
ESG Chapter 6 Engagement and Stewardship CFA ESG考试第六章重点知识梳理框架图
作者其他创作
大纲/内容
Ⅰ. What is Stewardship and Engagement
Stewardship<br>尽责管理
Stewardship is used to describe the <b>responsibilities</b> of institutional investors<br>
单词来源: The word 'steward' is derived from 'stig' and 'weard'🐖,<br>describing a guardian of a home - to <b>protect the owner's assets</b>
The steward is the <b>representative</b> of the owner charged with <b>acting in the owner's interests,<br>and delivering long-term returns</b> from their assets. The steward should always feel the <b>burden of fiduciary duty<br></b>(asset manager帮助asset owner管理资金-The preserving and enhacing of the long-term value of assets over time)<b><br></b>
<b>Components of Stewardship<br></b>如何做好stewardship?
Investment approach and decision<br>通过投资方法和投资决策
与投资标的"dialogue"
<b>Mornitoring</b>(监控<br>—单向的,为了了解investee
Dialogue for investment purposes:<br>to <u>understand</u> the company, its stakeholders and performance<br>Informs incremental buy/sell/hold devesions
<b>Detailed and specific questioning</b>;<br>investors <b>seeking insights</b>
<b>Engagement</b>(vote、escalation-升级)<br>—双向的,为了改变investee
Purposeful dialogue with a <b>specific and targeted<br>objective</b> to <b>achieve change</b>. Individual or <br>collective basis, as appropriate
<b>Two-way</b> dialogue<br>Investors expressing <b>opinions</b>
Engagement
Engagement is <b>one aspect of good stewardship</b>: it is the individual interventions in specific assets<br>to <b>preserve and enhace value</b>
Engagement is <b>active dialogue</b> with companies with a particular pupose
Engagement can <b>encompass the full range of issues</b> that affect the long-term<br>value of a business, including: strategy; capital structure; risk management
<b>Key identifiers</b> of successful genuine<b> engagement</b>
Clarity and consistency about <b>objectives</b>
Ensuring that it is <b>clear</b> when the investor is<br><b>communicating messages</b> to the company<br>and <b>not just seeking information</b> from it
<b>Ineffective Engagement</b><br>无效参与
Engagement <b>activity is directed at companies</b>
are <b>unlikely to change</b> (investee不愿改变)
have <b>no intent to enter into a productive dialogue</b><br>with their investor
Engagement as a response to<br><b>poor investment decision-making</b>
a desire to engage arises from a <b>share price fall</b>
<b>Knee-jerk engagement</b>: is less likely to be effective than<br><b>long-standing consistent messaging</b><br>发现投资决策错了,被迫去参与
<b>Effective Engagement</b><br>有效参与
is set in an appropriate context of <u>long-term ownership</u> and has a focus on<br><u>long-term value creation</u>, so that engagement is <b>aligned with the investment thesis</b> (长期)
is framed by a <b>close understanding of the nature of the compay</b> and the drivers<br>of its business model and long-term opportunity to prosper (每个investee不同)
recognizes that c<u>hange is a process</u>, change should <b>not be rushed (</b>不能心急)
employs <b>consistent, direct and honest messages and dialogue</b> (对话要有原则)
is appropriately resourced so that it can be delivered professionally in the context<br>of a <b>full understanding of the individual company</b> (充分了解investee)
<b>uses of resources efficiently</b> so that engagement coverage is as broad as possible<br>whilst using all the tools available, including collective engagement (有效利用资源)
<b>involves reflection </b>so that lessons are learning in order to<br>improve future engagement activity (复盘)
在投资实践中考虑ESG
PRI六大原则(自愿)<br>The PRI develoed 6 principles, which are voluntary<br>but provide overarching guidance on actions to<br>incorporating ESG inssues into investment practice
1. will <b>incorporate ESG issues into investment analysis</b> and <b>decision-making processes</b><br>投资决策中考虑ESG
2. will be <b>active owners</b> and <b>incorporate ESG issues</b> into our ownership policies and practices<br>主动参与 (<b>engagement</b>)
3. will seek appropriate <b>disclosure on ESG issues</b> by the entities in which we invest<br>促使被投资公司的披露
4. will <b>promote acceptance and implementation of the principles</b> within the investment industry<br>鼓励同行遵循PRI的准则
5. <b>work together</b> to enhance our effectiveness in implementing the principles<br>通过合作执行PRI的准则
6. will each r<b>eport on our activities and progress</b> towards implementing the principles<br>披露自己的表现
Engagement is the way in which investors put into effect their stewardship responsibilities<br><b>in line with</b> the <b><u>PRI principle 2 </u></b>(we will be active owners and incorporate ESG issues into our<br>ownership policies and practices)
<span style="font-weight:normal;">The </span>PRI highlighted <u>three </u><u>ESG engagement dynamics</u><br><span style="font-weight:normal;">that is believes create value</span>
<b>Communicative dynamics </b>(the exchange of information) — 交流
<b>Learning dynamics </b>(enhancing knowledge) — 学习
<b>Political dynamics </b>(building relationships 利益共同体)— 关系<br>(已经对公司有一定程度的understanding)
ESG engagement are beneficial
successful engagement activity was followed by <b>positive abnormal financial returns </b>
engaged companies change their behaviour against ESG factors, this<b> leads to increased value</b>
ESG engagement leads to a <b>reduction in downside risk</b> and the more successful the engagement, the stronger the effect
<b>Summary of Reasons of Engagement</b><br>总结:为什么要engagement?(5点原因)
helps <b>investee companies to understand their investors' expectations</b>, allowing them to <b>shape their long-term strategies</b> accordingly to suit them
enables companies to<b> explain </b>how their approach to sustainability <b>relates</b> to their broader <b>business strategy</b>,<br>and can provide <b>opportunities for companies to comment on ratings or scores driven by templates </b>that <br>they feel <b>do not reflect the complexity of an issue<br></b>使公司能够解释他们的可持续发展方法如何与其更广泛的业务战略相关联,<br>并且可以为公司提供对由他们认为不能反映问题复杂性的模板驱动的评级或分数发表评论的机会<b><br></b>
allows investors to work closely with an investee on <b>governance, social or environmental issues</b><br>允许投资者与被投资方就治理、社会或环境问题密切合作<br>
there are also <b>situations where engagement is required </b>and when an investor must take a view. <br>These could be corporate actions, such as share issuances in which the investor can choose to <br>participate or not, or <b>proposed takeovers</b> where the investor must <b>decide</b> whether to<br><b>sell up or, if it is permitted, to hold on to their shares<br></b>在某些情况下,投资者必须参与和发表意见(<b>重大决议</b>)。例如投资者可以选择参与或不参与的股票发行,或者投资者必须决定是否出售或保留其股票<b><br></b>
For most investors, some <b>dialogue</b> with the company will<br>be <b>needed before</b> reaching the relevant conclusion<br>对于大多数投资者来说,在得出相关结论之前,需要与公司进行一些对话<br>
another driver for investors to act as good stewards is the <b>growing expectations enshrined in codes, standards and regulations</b><br>对准则、标准和法规的期望不断提高<br>
Ⅱ. Codes and Standards
Background
As an adjunct to the institutional investor soul-searching that followed the financial crisis,<br>the <b>Walker Report </b>ushered in a new ear of shareholder engagement<br>Walker Report开始shareholder engagement的新纪元
<b>Walker Report is the first stewardship code after the post-financial crisis report</b>
<b>Financial Reporting Council (FRC) — issue a stewardship code(发布)</b>
<b>Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)</b> — the code was to be <b>reinforced by the FCA</b>, requirement that<br>any registered fund manager must make a statement as to whether and how it approached its principle<b>(落实)</b>
The 2010 Stewardship Code<br><span style="font-weight:normal;">(in 2010 the FRC issued the world's<br>first stewardship code)</span>
Insitituational investors<br>should follow 7 principles<br>7个原则
针对Asset Manager
1. publicly <b>disclose</b> their policy on <b>how</b> they will discharge their <b>stewardship responsibilities</b><br>披露如何满足stewardship责任
2. have a policy on <b>managing conflicts of interest</b> in relation to stewardship and this policy<br>should be publicly <b>disclosed </b>如何处理利益冲突(不同主体关于利益冲突的处理不一致)
7. <b>report periodically on their stewardship and voting activities</b><br>定期报告其管理和投票活动(投资情况)<br>
针对Investee
3. <b>monitor their investee companies</b> 监控被投资公司
4. <b>establish clear guidelines on when and how they will escalte their activities</b><br>as a method of protecting and enhacing shareholder value 如何升级
5. willing to <b>act collectively </b>with other investors where appropriate 联合其他投资者
6. have a clear <b>policy on voting and disclosure of voting activities</b> 投票政策和披露
The UK Stewardship Code model has been <b>followed around the world</b>, and now such codes in 20 markets, either<br>developed by stock exchanges or regulators, or by investor bodies themselves keen to <b>advance best practice</b>
It is notable that while there is <b>great consistency</b> between the principles in each of these codes,<br>as they are modelled closely on the 7 principles of the 2010 UK Code
<b>Conflicts of interest are dealt with very differently</b><br>利益冲突的处理方式截然不同<br>
It has been stated that those codes <b>drafted by the fund management industry</b><br>are more likely to<b> downplay the issue of conflicts<br></b>基金管理行业起草的准则更有可能淡化冲突问题<b><br></b>
while those <b>codes with greater regulatory backing</b> place greater emphasis on the issue
Code Revisions 2020
The 2020 version of the code includes<b> twelve principles</b> (plus an <b>alternate six for service providers</b>)<br>增加到12个原则(增加针对"小助理"的要求)
<b>Biggest change</b>
the <b>increased ambition for practical delivery by signatories</b><br>
the <b>former focus on statements</b> of intent no longer exists, instead, <br>investors are <b>now expected to report annually on activity</b>, and most<br>importantly on<b> outcomes from that activity</b><br>以前表决心,现在要报告做的结果,更加实物<br>
The twelve new principles fall into four categories<br>but cover <b>two distinct functions</b>
principles 1 to 8 addres the <b>foundations for stewardship</b>
principles 9 to 12 focus on the <b>practical discharge of engagement responsibilities</b><br>and cover <b>engagement (and voting) activities</b>
Other Code Provisions
The principles of all other codes around the world are remarkably similar
Typically there are six or seven principles
with the <u>first</u> requiring investors to have a <b>public policy</b> regarding stewardship
the <u>last</u> for honest and open <b>reporting of stewardship activities</b>
The main body of the principles between these two usually call for:
regular <b>monitoring of investee companies</b>
<b>active engagement</b> (sometimes termed "escalation", or escalation is deemed worthy of a separate principle of its own) <br><b>and intelligent voting</b>
The <b>two principles that are sometimes but not always present</b>
investors to manage their conflicts of interest regarding stewardship matters<br>投资者管理与管理事务相关的利益冲突<br>
the <b>escalation</b> of stewardship activity to include a willingness to act<br>collectively with other institutional investors
Ⅲ. Engagement<br>
1. Engagement styles
Some engagement start <b>bottome-up</b> by <b>focuing on the specific issues faced by an individual company</b>,<br>while others operate<b> top-down</b> by applying <b>a perspective on particular issues</b> (e.g., limate change)<br>across all companies <b>in a sector or market</b>
Top-down & Bottom-up
Top-down(从investor relations开始沟通)
<b>material E and S issues</b><br>arise from the <b>nature of a company's business activities</b>,<br>teams with this heritage tend to be organized by <b>sector</b>(影响整个行业)
focus on individual environmental and social issues and to pursue<br>those vigorously across <b>sectors or markets as a whole</b>
the dialogue would tend to <b>start with investor relations or sustainability<br>teams</b> and then be <b>escalated upwards</b>, both to <b>senior management and<br>to the board level</b>
<b><u>Issue-based, top-down</u></b> engagement tends to align more closely with <b>passive</b><br>or otherwise broadly <b>diversified investment portfolios</b>(多投资标的)
Bottom-up(从chair开始沟通)
<b>G issues</b> are determined more by <b>national law and codes</b>,<br>and such teams are usually <b>split according to geography</b>
Firms with a governance heritage tend to <b>focus on individual companies</b>,<br><b>starting with the chair</b> (often with the assistance of the <b>company secretary</b>)<br>and working through the <b>board</b> and <b>down to management</b> from there<br>专注于个别公司,由董事长负责(通常在公司秘书的协助下)然后通过董事会一直到管理层<br>
<b><u>Company-focused, bottom-up</u></b> engagement fits most naturally with <b>active<br>investment approaches</b>, particularly those with <b>concentrated </b>portfolios(公司少)
<b>Issue-based & Company-focused</b>
<b>Issue-based engagement</b><br>某一类问题,影响很多公司
<b>Passive investors</b>, and others with broadly <b>diversified portfolios</b>, typically <b>start with an issue</b>,<br>whether identified by the team from news or broader analysis, or through a screening or other<br>research provider, and <b>seek to engage with all the companies impacted by that issue</b>
Usuallly the starting point is <b>a letter written to all those impacted</b>
<b>Issue-based </b>approaches to engagement are often <b>accompanied by examples of best practices in a particular area</b>.<br>These may be <u>developed in advance of the first engagement dialogues</u> but usually come out of the engagement <br>process with those companies that are deemed to have leading practices
<b>Company-focused engagement</b><br>某一个公司的具体问题
<b>Active investors</b>, particularly those with <b>focused portfolios</b>, <b>start with the company itself<br>and its business issues</b> and develop a <b>tailored engagement approach</b> cutting across a <br>range of issues, often with the investment teams taking a leading role. Companies selected<br>for this approach are identified from <b>investment underperformers or ones that trigger<br>other financial or ESG metrics</b>
The starting point is to seek a <b>direct discussion with senior management and then the board</b>
<b>Company-focused </b>engagement seeks to <b>improve practice</b> across a number of <b>relevant ESG issues<br>at an individual company</b>; the aim is to <b>enhance performance of the portfolio overall</b>, both in terms<br>of <b>ESG and investment performance</b>
2. Practicalities of<br>Effective Engagement<br>有效参与的落地
The <b>first contact is with the company secretary</b>, and then further dialogue maybe<br>with the<b> chair</b> of the relevant board committee (remuneration or audit) and/or the<br>chair of the board
Meeting can be held at the <u>corporate head office</u> or at the <u>investment firm</u>
Successful engagement is often a<br><b>multi-stage, multi-year activity</b>
Frequently, a company's<b> culture, history, or individuals might stand in the way of change</b>
<b>Media interest often entrenches positions</b> rather than allowing the fluidity that may be<br>necessary for change to occur. The dialogue should initially <b>take place privately</b> without<br>media attention<br>媒体的兴趣往往会巩固立场,而不是允许变革发生所需的流动性。 <br>对话最初应在没有媒体关注的情况下私下进行<br>
<b>Forms of Engagement</b><br>参与的形式
Individual engagement<br>单打独斗(5个)
<span style="font-size:inherit;">Generic letter<br></span>通用信件
these are <b>broad communications</b> across a swathe of investment holdings
Tailored letter<br>量身定制的信件<br>
these are <b>more targeted</b> and can cover a range of topics at varied levels of detail
'Housekeeping' engagement<br>
this is an <b>annual dialogue</b> to help maintain and enhance a<br>relationship with a company, but with only limited objectives<br>年度对话,旨在帮助维持和加强与公司的关系,但目标有限<br>
Active private engagement<br>积极的私人参与<br>
targeted and specific engagement<br>有针对性和具体的参与<br>
Active public engagement<br>积极的公众参与<br>
engagement deliberately made <b>public by the institution</b><br>机构有意公开的参与<br>
<b>Collaborative engagement</b><br>组团参与(7个 )
<span style="font-size:inherit;">Informal discussions</span><br>
institutions discuss views of particular corporate situations
Collaborative campaigns<br>
<b>collaborative letter-writing</b> or <b>market-wide campaigns</b>
Follow-up dialogue<br>
<b>company engagement dialogue</b> led by one or some investors in<br>follow-up to a broader group letter or expression of views<br>由一位或部分投资者主导的公司参与对话对更广泛的团体信函或意见表达采取后续行动<br>
<b>Soliciting support<br></b>寻求支持<br>
solicitation of <b>broader support</b> for formal publicly stated targets<br>为正式公开的目标争取更广泛的支持<br>
<b>Group meetings</b><br>
one-off group meeting <b>with a company</b> followed up with individual<br>investor reflections on the discussion or with a <b>co-signed letter</b>
Collective engagement<br>
a <b>formal coalition of investors </b>with a<b> clear objective</b>, typically<br><u>working over time and with a coordinating body</u>
Concert party<br><span style="font-weight:normal;">一致行动人</span>
<b>formal agreement</b>, in any form, with <b>concrete objectives and agreed steps</b><br>e.g. collectively proposing a shareholder resolution or agreeing on how<br>to vote on a particular matter)
<b>Key success factors for<br>effective engagement</b><br>有效参与的成功因素
<b>Characteristics of engagement approach</b><br>参与过程/方式
<b>Objectives</b> should be <b>specific</b> and <b>targeted</b> to enable <b>clarity</b> delivery<br>针对性(目标明确)
Objectives should be <b>strategic or governance-led</b>, or linked to material<br>strategic and/or governance issues<br>战略性
The engagement approach should be bespoke (<b>tailored</b>) to the target company <br>参与方法应针对目标公司定制<br>
<b>Characteristics of investor collaboration</b><br>如何组团
The <b>participants</b> should have clear <b>leadership</b> with appropriate relationships,<br>skills and knowledge<br>领导力
The <b>scale of coalition</b> gathered (both scale of shareholding and overall AUM<br>of group) should be meaningful<br>足够的规模达到影响力
The coalition should have a <b>prior relationship</b> and/or <b>cultural awareness</b><br>of the target company<br>维持与被投资公司的良好关系
<b>Barriers to Engagement</b><br>参与的障碍
<b>Resource constraints</b><br>资源限制
One of the <b>most significant constraints</b> on effective stewardship and engagement is <b>resource</b>
如何解决
<b>Prioritizing with care</b> 确定优先级
<b>Using collective and collaborative</b> engagement resources<br>使用集体和协作参与资源,组团参与<br>
<b>Hiring new resource</b>
Expecting more <b>ESG delivery</b> from mainstrean <b>fund management teams</b><br>ESG基金
<b>Behavior constraints:<br></b>the behavioral challenges in working<br>as part of <b>investor coalitions</b> are significant<br>行为限制
The challenge of<b> reaching consensus</b><br>难以达成共识<br>
<b>Conflicts of interest</b>: conflicts can arise when investment managers<br>have business relations with the same companies they engage with<br>利益冲突<br>
<b>Competition</b><br>竞争<br>
<b>historically, few people</b> worked in this <b>once</b> considerably<br>under-resourced area, stewardship professionals have <b>been<br>content to work together</b> (曾经缺乏资源)
as <b>stewardship is becoming more important</b> to clients and<br>an increased focus for investment consultants and fund managers<br>there are signs that this <b>collaborative approach may be waning</b><br>随着管理对客户变得越来越重要,以及投资顾问和基金经理越来越关注<br>有迹象表明这种协作方式可能正在减弱<br>
3. Steps of engagement
<b>Strategy and tactics: Goal-setting</b><br>资源有限,考虑性价比,确定优先级
<b>Necessary prioritization:<br></b>Given these <b>resource constraints</b>, engagement strategies<br>must be <b>designed</b> to deliver <b>meaningful results</b> in the<br>most <b>cost and time-effective manner<br></b>
Investors need to <b>define the scope of the engagement</b> and<br><b>prioritize their engagement activities</b> carefully to ensure it<br>is v<b>alue-adding </b>for their <u>clients/beneficiaries</u> and impactful<br>in terms of delivering improved corporate practices <br><b>明确参与范围</b>
Investors need to <b>frame the engagement topic</b> (be it climate<br>risk or supply chain risk) <b>into the broader discussion</b> around<br><b>strategy and long-term financial performance</b> with the<br>management team and the board<br><b>明确参与话题</b>
Investors must<b> develop a clear process</b> that articulates <b>realistic</b><br><b>goals and milestones</b> so that both investment institutions and<br>their clients have a <b>clear indicator</b> to measure their expectation<br>and the effectiveness of the engagement strategy<br><b>明确目标里程碑(结果导向)</b>
The engagement process needs to be <b>adapted to the local context,<br>language and cultural</b> approaches to doing business<br>“入乡随俗”
Beyond dialogue, investors need to have <b>clear escalation measures</b><br>in case engagement fails
<b>Two different forms</b> of necessary prioritization
1. identifying <b>which company</b> in a portfolio is<br><b>most in need of engagement</b>
2. determining <b>which engagement issues</b> <b>should<br>be prioritized</b> in the dialogue between the investor<br>and the company<br>(应该去参与哪个年会投票属于干扰项)
The approach to engagement must always <b>sit within the<br>framework of the fund manager's investment approach</b><br>参与方法必须始终处于基金经理投资方法的框架内<br>
An <b>active manager</b> may well find it <b>easier to prioritize<br>both the company and the issue</b> as those where most<br><b>value</b> is at risk <b>within portfolios</b>
The existence of risk suggests that<br>if the manager is active, <b>selling a holding<br></b>in a company will always be a possible<br>appropriate action
For <b>passive investors</b>, a focus is on the <b>largest companies</b><br>and on the <b>most material issues</b><br>投资组合中公司多,分散化,资源稀缺,难确定优先级,engagement差
<b>Escalation of Engagement</b>(升级)<br>先低后高,先内后外
Introduction: Sometimes engagement <b>must be escalated to have effects</b>.<br>This can be through a range of mechanisms, including <b>making concerns<br>publicly known, proposing shareholder resolutions, or working<br>collectively with other shareholders</b><br>有时必须升级才能产生效果。 这可以通过一系列机制来实现<br>包括公开关注的问题、提出股东决议或与其他股东共同合作<br>
<b>Forms of escalation</b><br>升级的形式<u> (voting不属于升级)</u>
<b>holding additional meetings with management</b> specifically to discuss concerns<br>与管理层举行额外会议专门讨论问题<br>
<b>expressing concerns</b> through the <b>company's advisers</b><br>通过公司顾问表达担忧<br>
<b>meeting</b> with the <b>chair or other board members<br></b>与主席或其他董事会成员会面<b><br></b>
<b>intervening jointly with other institutions</b> on particular issues<br>与其他机构联合干预特定问题<br>
<b>making a public statement</b> in advance of <b>general meetings</b><br>在股东大会之前发表公开声明<br>
<b>submitting resolutions </b>and <b>speaking at general meetings</b><br>提交决议并在股东大会上发言<br>
<b>requesting a general meeting</b>, in some cases proposing to<br><b>change board membership</b><br>要求召开股东大会,在某些情况下提议更改董事会成员<br>
<b>Additional methods</b> used by some as part<br>of their escalation models might include<br>在其升级模型中使用的其他方法可能包括:<br>
Writing a <b>formal letter</b> setting out concerns, usually following one of the above<br>meeting, and typically to the<b> chair<br></b>通常在上述会议之一之后,通常写给主席一封正式信函,阐述疑虑<b><br></b>
<b>Seeking dialogue with other stakeholders</b>, including regulators, banks, creditors,<br>customers, suppliers, the workforce and non-governmental organisations (NGOs)<br>寻求与其他利益相关者的对话<br>
<b>Formally requesting a special audit </b>of the company (a right for shareholders in<br>certain countries, most notably<b> Germany</b>, to consider particular areas of concern<br>正式要求对公司进行特别审计(股东的权利)<br>
Taking concerns <b>public in the media</b> or some other form, not only as the code<br>said to AGMs or other general meetings<br>通过媒体或其他形式公开关注问题,而不仅仅是将其作为准则<br>在年度股东大会或其他股东大会上表示<br>
<b>Seeking governance improvement</b> and/or damages through <b>litigation</b>, other<br>legal remedies or arbitration<br>通过诉讼、其他法律补救措施或仲裁寻求治理改进和/或损害赔偿<br>
Formally adding the company to an <b>exclusion list</b>, or otherwise exiting or <br>threatening to <b>exit from the investment</b><br>正式将公司列入<b>排除名单</b>,或以其他方式退出或威胁<b>撤资</b><br>
Many engagement objectives<b> can be managed without any escalation</b>,<br>and indeed investors may choose to <b>move slower</b> in an engagement <br><b>rather than escalate</b> so as to <b>maintain positive relations</b> with a company<br>they may wish to remain invested in for many years
<b>Given resource constraints</b>: an investor must always be prepared to take the view<br>that <b>little further progress can be made so an engagement should be paused</b><br>当无法取得进一步进展时,应暂停参与
The investor needs to consider <b>whether steps are warranted by the objective<br></b>升级要确保能够达到目标<b><br></b>
Many <b>escalation tools</b> need to be <b>used wisely and not over-exploited</b><br>不要滥用升级方式
The step of <b>making concerns public through the media or social media</b><br>needs to be applied with <b>care</b> because the investor who rarely raises<br>issues in public will be listened to more on the occasions when it<br>does than an investor who is always expressing views publicly
Public engagement
One form of <b>public engagement</b> is putting<br><b>forward a shareholder resolution</b><br>公众参与的一种形式是提出股东决议<br>
though the<b> local law</b> often <b>restricts the nature of the resolution</b><br>that can be proposed, as well as the<b> size and period of <br>shareholding</b> that the proponents of the resolution must<br> represent to hold the right
In <b>many jurisdictions</b>, the <b>resolution must be made public by the company</b>;<br>在许多司法管辖区,该决议必须由公司公开;<br>
but in the <b>USA</b>, they do <b>not typically enter the public domain until the<br>papers for the relevant AGM are published<br></b>但在美国,它们通常不会进入公共领域,直到相关年度股东大会的文件已发表<b><br></b>
this will be after the <b>company</b> has tried to <b>exclude the resolution</b><br><b>from the AGM agenda</b> and sought a<b> ruling from the SEC</b><br>公司试图将该决议排除在年度股东大会议程之外并寻求美国证券交易委员会的裁决之后<br>
proposing a shareholder resolution in the <b>USA</b> can therefore be<br>the trigger for <b>private engagement</b>, which may reach enough of<br>a <b>satisfactory conclusion for the investor to withdraw the resolution<br></b>在美国提出股东决议可能会引发私人参与,得出足够令人满意的结论后让投资者撤回决议<b><br></b>
<b>One form of escalation</b> that is considered by many institutions is <b>disinvestment</b><br>撤资也是升级的一种形式
Collective engagement
<b>Advantages<br></b>优点
<b>Collective engagement</b> is often the most<b> resource-efficient method for engagement</b>,<br>every investor is inevitably resource-constrained and <b>pooling those limited resources</b><br>should enable <b>greater efficiency</b><br>有限的资源下最大化参与的有效性
Collective engagement is a key route to <b>maximizing effectiveness from limited resources</b>
<b>Disadvantages</b><br>缺点
The challenges around collective engagement are perhaps the obvious ones of <b>coordinating a<br>potentially disparate group of separate investors and trying to maintain a consistent perspective</b>,<br>or at least <b>enough consistency of perspective</b>, that the company receives a clear message<br>from its investors in the key areas. <b>难以达成共识</b>
Investors must beware of <b>regulatory constraints</b> such as<br>rules against <b>acting in concert. </b>The most significant of<br>which is a possible need to <b>launch a takeover bid</b> for the company<br>监管限制:如果抱团达成一致行动人的效力(acting in concert)<br>例如:达到实质性控股,将会受到控股股东的监管限制
Informal collaboration between investors
Specialist stewardship service providers
Investor association aggregating member views(私下)
<b>Collective Stewardship Vehicles</b><br>
Commercial approach
predominantly <b>offered by fund managers</b> who offer <b>stewardship overlay services</b>,<br>such as voting advice and direct engagement activities, taking forward engagement<br>work on behalf of clients whether they invest money on their behalf or not<br>基金经理提供,例如投票建议和直接参与活动<br>
Some of the main players in the <b>overlay markets</b> are Columbia Threadneedle Investment<br>"<b>Responsible Engagement Overlay" (REO)</b> Service, <b>Federated Hermes EOS, Robeco</b>, and <b>Sustainalytics</b>
Noncommercial approach
Investor Forum Framwork<br><span style="font-weight: normal;">-prominent among these is the</span><br>UK's The Investor Forum<span style="font-weight: normal;">, created<br>in 2014 as response to the Kay<br>Review call for such a vehicle</span>
尽责管理工作:使受托资产<b>保值增值</b>
投资方法与决策:在投资组合和个人资产水平上,<br>根据投资目的、委托和客户利益进行资本配置
对话:公司和投资者之间的积极讨论<br>其中有两个主要形式
监督
以投资为目的的对话:了解公司、其利益相关者和业绩<br>告知增量购买/出售/持有决策
<b>参与</b>
有目的的对话,有具体和针对性的目的,以实现变革<br>以个人或集体参与为基础,视情况而定
Investor Forum投资者论坛十个特征
<b>Trusted facilitator, not an adviser</b>: members retain<b> full voting </b>and other investment<br>rights in respect of their shareholdings 值得信赖的推动者/主持人,而非顾问,<b>不提供意见</b>
<b>Opt in/ opt out</b>: a member <b>actively chooses to participate</b> in an engagement involving<br>a company in which it is a shareholder. It can also choose to<b> opt out of an engagement</b><br>at any time 自愿选择参与或者退出
<b>Complementary to members' direct engagement</b>: members are actively encouraged to<br>continue their <b>direct interaction with companies</b> outside the forum's auspices<br>作为会员直接参与的补充:积极鼓励个体继续与论坛之外的公司进行<b>直接互动</b><br>
<b>Confidentiality</b>: members must agree to <b>comply with confidentiality obligations during an engagement</b>.<br>Participants must agree upon <b>disclosure of identities and public statements during an engagement</b><br>保密性:成员必须同意在参与期间遵守保密义务。参与者必须同意在参与期间披露身份和公开声明<br>
<b>Nominated key engagement contact</b>: members retain <b>full control</b> as to whether or not they <b>receive<br>information</b>, and who receives that information<br>指定的关键参与联系人:成员完全控制是否接收信息以及谁接收该信息<br>
<b>Hub and spoke model</b>: a <b>bilateral model </b>is the usual method of communication <b>between<br>the executive and members involved in engagement<br></b>中心辐射模式:双边模式是高管与参与成员之间通常采用的沟通方式<b><br></b>
<b>No inside information</b>: participation in an engagement will not exempt any person from<br>any law or regulation governing the use and <b>dissemination of inside information</b><br>不提供内幕消息
<b>No-concert part and no-group</b>: members agree that while participating in a forum<br>engagement they will <b>not form a concert party</b> in respect of the relevant company,<br>including by requisitioning a board control-seeking resolution or seeking to obtain<br>control of the company<br><b>非一致行动人和非一致行动团体</b>:成员同意,在参加论坛活动时,他们不会对相关公司组<br>成一致行动人,包括要求董事会控制权决议或寻求获得对公司的控制权<br>
<b>Heightened procedures</b>: at various points in an engagement, heightened procedures<br>maybe deemed necessary, including <b>seeking specialist advice</b><br>加强程序:在合作的各个阶段,可能认为有必要加强程序,包括寻求专家建议<br>
<b>Conflict of interest avoidance</b>: the forum maintains control procedures to <b>avoid conflicts<br>of interest</b> which could impact <b>either its own governance or individual engagement</b><br>避免利益冲突<br>
Voting
<b>Voting is a particular form</b> of engagement, a <b>key tool for the</b> <b>active investor</b>,<br>and any <b>voting decision should be aligned with the investment thesis</b> for the<br>holding and any stewardship agenda that the institution has in relation to the<br>company. It is most visible, however, by its nature it is formulaic
<b>投票关注点<br>(例子)</b>
<b>资本结构问题(债务问题/破产风险)</b><br>If there are concerns about the <b>capital structure and financial viability of the business</b>,<br>investors need to pay attention to votes in relation to <b>dividends, share buybacks, scope of further debt burden</b>
<b>董事会组成问题</b><br>If there are concerns about the <b>effectiveness or diversity of the board</b>,<br>that needs to be reflected in voting decisions on <b>director re-elections</b>
<b>审计过程问题</b><br>If there are concerns about the <b>independence or effectiveness of the audit process</b>,<br>should be reflected in voting on the <b>reappointment of the auditor, its pay and the<br>reappointment of members of the audit committee</b>
<b>Different proportions</b><br>少数服从多数
In most cases, <b>voting is proportionate to the percentage of shareholding</b> in the company <br>and resolutions are usually<b> passed when more than half</b> of those voting support a vote<br>投票与公司<b>持股比例</b>成正比,决议通常在<b>半数以上</b>投票支持某项投票时通过
In a few cases, <b>special resolutions</b> require support by<b> 75% </b>of those voting<br>重大事项须大多数同意<br>
<b>Abstention(弃权)can sometimes be a useful tool in an engagement process<br></b>where the investor does <b>not have a fixed view</b> on an issue
Common voting resolutions
Given the level of attention on <b>executive pay</b>(高管薪酬), investors take<br>a close interest in resolutions on <b>remuneration</b><br>
Asset manager利用股东身份,通过投票来影响被投资公司如何使用资产
Investors will reflect concerns about <b>financial</b>(财务报表)<b> or sustainability reporting</b><br>in their votes to approve the report and accounts
More companies follow the<b> International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) <br></b>guidance and incorporate material<b> climate change </b>issues in their financials<br>IASB要求披露气候改变对财务的影响
some are likely to <b>vote against reports and accounts</b> where it is <b>not clear</b> that<br><b>climate change has been incorporated</b>, or <b>assumptions are not disclosed</b>
some are considering <b>voting against auditors of heavily climate-exposed companies</b><br>which do<b> not include climate issues</b> among the <b>key audit matters </b>in their auditor reports<br>一些公司正考虑投票反对那些受气候影响较大的公司的审计师,因为这些公司没有<br>将气候问题纳入审计报告中的关键审计事项<br>
some vote against key <b>board directors</b> of companies that do not show sufficient signs<br>of <b>climate awareness</b> where they have key risk exposures<br>
<b>Ways for investors to make their voting activity<br>more effective and influential</b><br>让投票活动有效力
Hold an <b>active dialogue </b>with the company <b>ahead of the decision</b><br>投票前与高管交流
Though <b>most institutional investors do not physically attend</b> shareholder meetings,<br>perhaps stewards <b>should give this opportunity </b>more active consideration<br>投票中亲自参与
The <b>attendance at AGMs</b> can gain unusually <b>direct access </b>to many<br>directors at one time, with must scope for<b> informal dialogue<br></b>出席年度股东大会可以同时与多位董事进行直接接触,并有机会进行非正式对话<b><br></b>
Since the <b>full board</b> typically attend most AGMs, these meetings can<br>offer investors an <b>unusual insight into board dynamics<br></b>由于全体董事会成员通常会出席大多数年度股东大会,因此这些会议可以为<br>投资者提供了解董事会动态的独特见解<b><br></b>
Any vote will rarely be meaningful in itself because there may be a range of<br>reasons that an investor might have for <b>voting in any particular way</b><br>投票后与高管交流
Institutions <b>communicate to companies </b>why they have<b> voted </b>in particular ways,<br>either in writing or in dialogue 面或对话的方式向公司传达他们这样投票的原因
This dialogue is a form of<b> low-level engagement with limited impacts<br></b>这种对话是一种低层次的接触形式,影响有限<b><br></b>
Ⅳ. Asset Classes<br>
Corporate fixed income<br>公司债
Fixed income investors may ultimately be concerned with the likelihood of <b>default</b> (违约), <br>but <b>ESG factors</b> can <b>impact credit ratings</b> and <b>affect spreads</b>, leading to short-term changes in value<br>ESG因素影响信用评级,从而影响债务表现(影响利差和违约风险,从而导致价值的短期变化)
Companies that regularly<b> raise capital</b>(融资)<b> in fixed income markets</b> are becoming more<br>conscious of investors' interest in<b> ESG as a material factor in their pricing of debt</b><br>投资之前关心债务的ESG问题,投资者对 ESG 的兴趣是其债务定价的重要因素
The greatest opportunity to push for conditions and disclosures around ESG is likely to be <b>pre-issuance</b>. <br>This can be difficult to implement in fast-moving public markets but is e<b>asier to effect in private debt issuance<br></b>推动 ESG 条件和披露的最大机会可能是<b>发行前</b>。这在快速发展的公开市场中可能难以实施,但在私人债务发行中更容易实现<b><br></b>
In almost all cases relating to <b>ESG matters at companies that are going concerns </b>(长期的), <br>the<b> interests of long-term</b> investors (whether they are exposed to equity or debt) very much align <br>and it will<b> benefit all</b> if the company <b>effectively deals with an ESG concern<br></b>在几乎所有与持续经营公司 ESG 问题相关的案例中,长期投资者(无论他们投资的是股权还是债务)<br>的利益都是一致的,如果公司有效地处理 ESG 问题,将使所有人受益<b><br></b>
<b>The PRI's guide to ESG engagement for fixed income investors</b><br>Investors should <b>prioritize engagement</b> based on:
the <b>size </b>of a holding in the portfolio
<b>lower credit quality</b> issuers (with less balance<br>sheet flexibility to absorb negative ESG impacts)
<b>key themes</b> that are<b> material</b> to sectos
issuers with <b>low ESG scores</b>
Sovereign debt<br>主权债
The<b> stewardship interaction with sovereign debt issuers </b>is likely to be much more<b> limited</b>. <br>Only the largest investors are likely to have any scope to influence the stance of nation-states, <br>the <b>influence may be minimal</b> 主动参与非常有限,重点进行筛选
The <b>ESG approach</b> usually applied in this asset class is <b>screening or an ESG tilt</b><br>in the investment process rather than engagement (国家层面难直接参与)<br>通常采用的 ESG 方法是在投资过程中进行筛选或 ESG 倾斜<br>
The<b> PRI's guide</b> to ESG engagement for sovereign issuer
This makes clear the fledgling nature of engagement in this area and is more<br><b>focused on learning how engagement might happen</b> rather than on <br>highlighting successful case studies<br>更侧重于了解参与度如何发生(可能性),而不是强调成功的案例研究<br>
There is a particular focus on <b>educating sovereign issuers</b> about the <br><b>value of green bonds</b> and the <b>strong market appetite</b> for such instruments<br>绿色债券的价值和市场需求
<b>Private equity<br>私募股权</b>
<b>Direct ESG engagement</b> will be undertaken by the <b>general partner (GP, the private equity house) </b><br>rather than the limited partner (LP, the asset owner) GP进行直接的ESG参与
The PRI's guide
The process of portfolio monitoring has <b>value protection and enhancement potential</b> in itself, <br>as a systematic approach for identifying material ESG issues, setting objectives and regularly tracking process
It enables <b>GPs</b> to identify anomalies and achievements; support regular engagement with the<b> portfolio company</b><br>on these issues; and <b>strengthen company reporting practices</b> that could have implications at exit
Infrastructure<br>基础设施
Infrastructure investors are <b>exposed to ESG across the economic lifetime </b>of their assets. These exposures extend beyond issues related directly to a specific asset. Such as health and safety, supply chains and environment - to factors such as climate change, bribery and corruption and the social license to operate 基础设施投资者的资产在<b>经济生命周期内都会受到 ESG 的影响</b>。这些影响不仅限于与特定资产直接相关的问题,例如健康和安全、供应链和环境,还包括气候变化、贿赂和腐败以及经营的社会许可等因素<br>
The PRI's guide
Use ESG assessments undertaken during<b> due diligence</b> (尽职调查)to prioritize attention to<br>ESG consideration and potential for improving profitability, efficiency and risk management<br>利用尽职调查期间进行的 ESG 评估,优先考虑 ESG 因素以及提高盈利能力、效率和风险管理的潜力<br>
Include <b>material ESG risks and opportunities </b>identified during <b>due diligence</b> into the<br>post-acquisition plan of each asset or project company and integrate this into <br>asset management activities<br>将尽职调查中发现的重大ESG风险和机遇纳入各资产或项目公司的收购后计划,并融入资产管理活动中<br>
Engage with, and encourage, the management of the business to act on the<br>identified ESG risks and opportunities using the mechanisms available
Set performance targets, and advocate a governance framework. Define and communicate <br>the expectations of ESG operations and maintenance performance to the infrastructure business managers
Property<br>房地产
<b>Like fixed income</b>, there is good evidence of the<b> positive effect</b> of ESG <b>on returns </b>to real estate investments<br>类似于固定收益,ESG 对房地产投资回报产生积极影响,租金收入受ESG影响
<b>Regulatory changes</b> are driving a need for greater engagement in relation to ESG in real estate<br>监管变化推动了房地产行业对 ESG 参与度的提高<br>
Investors should <b>engage indirectly</b> by requiring their <b>managers </b>to <b>report</b> on the <br>frameworks and metrics that they should use to monitor holdings
UNEP FI recommends that real estate investment stakeholders:
engage, directly or indirectly, on public policy to manage risks
support research on ESG and cliamte risks
support sector initiatives to develop resources to understand<br>risks and integrate ESG
<font color="#ffffff"><b>2021年绿色债券支持目录<br>行业分类:一级目录</b></font>
节能环保产业
清洁生产产业
清洁能源产业
生态环境产业
基础设施绿色升级
绿色服务
<b>Investor (Asset Owner)</b>
<b>Asset Owner</b>
<b>Investee (Invested Company)</b>
0 条评论
下一页